Jenny Levine’s
insistent mention of libraries and librarians at bloggerCon highlighted
categorization of the web as an unaddressed topic. Any librarian or
skilled library-user understands that cataloging systems are nuts. Doug Miller says it with more patience in a reflection on Dave Winer’s latest directory exploration: “???Worse, if someone else creates the taxonomy, it’s almost guaranteed
that it isn’t going to make sense to me. I’m not going to necessarily
see the logic of classifying item A in category X, sub-category X.1,
sub-sub-category X.1.2. I have to first understand the taxonomy ??? learn to
navigate it, and then make judgments on how well I feel the taxonomy
agrees with my perception of how things are organized and relate to
each other. Hence, I’ve never been able to stand Yahoo! or DMOZ or any
other web directory. To me, they seem arbitrary and confining at the
same time??? Finally, at the end of the day, what tends to interest me most are
the relationships???and relationships are often the most relative thing
in the world, at least when one is talking about people or ideas.
Relationships between people and ideas change and evolve constantly,
and so any system that seeks to reflect those relationships has to
change and evolve constantly as well. That makes maintaining taxonomy
and hierarchy, particularly shared taxonomy and hierarchy a very, very
high-cost task, if not down right impossible.”
That last italicized paragraph, applied to teaching practice and the
emerging field of “learning object repositiories (LORs),” explains my
standing contention that learning itself “objects” to learning
objects. I remember teachers from my learning history, moments of being educated, “led forth” to some new discovery. I don’t remember textbooks, those ur-LORs. From my teaching history, I remember
teaching partners, those magical relationships that pushed me to make
something new out of what I already knew in order to keep fresh a
passion for learning in myself and in my students. I don’t remember scope and sequence binders. (And Buddha be praised, I don’t remember any “learning standards.” LOL!)
Blogs, linking and unlinking, are just such non-taxonomic
partnerships. More power to the WWW’s Dewey Decimal System pioneers. As
you proceed, however, revere the unclassifiable.